- Myth: IRV is confusing
- Myth: Two elections are better than one
- Myth: IRV disenfranchises voters
- Myth: IRV does not reduce negative campaigning
- Myth: IRV doesn’t produce majority winners
- Myth: IRV can’t be counted by machines
- Myth: IRV doesn’t change the outcome, so why bother?
- Myth: Repeal efforts are proof that IRV doesn’t work.
- Conclusion
Myth: IRV can’t be counted by machines
Reality: IRV is counted by machines in most jurisdictions in the US and abroad.
IRV-capable equipment is used across the country – in San Francisco, Pierce County, Cambridge (MA), Burlington (VT) and Aspen (CO) and in Scotland, New Zealand and other countries – to tally ballots.
IRV-capable machines will not be used in Minneapolis
in 2009 because they are not certified for use in Minnesota. Minneapolis anticipates that certified IRV-capable machines
will be available for purchase by the next scheduled municipal election in
2013. According to elections director Joe Mansky, Ramsey County
anticipates buying new machines by 2011 and they will have the opportunity to purchase
IRV-capable machines for this election. The next generation of voting equipment is IRV-capable.



